In my opinion, these puzzles were all manually created by their designer and are not derived from a deterministic wallet. This is because there are no visible patterns in these addresses that are typically found in deterministic wallets. I believe that understanding psychology is more important than cryptography in this case. We need to analyze the personal and individual characteristics of the puzzle creator to determine what pattern might have been in their mind when they designed the puzzles.


I think you're gonna get a lot of pushback on this. But lets entertain this nonsense for a second as I too, try to think outside of the box, even if objectively ridiculous.

Lets assume that out of the two-posts the creator made on this forum, you're able to accurately psycho analyze this guy. What then? Whats your next move?
[/quote]
By categorizing addresses based on their initial phrases and analyzing how they move within the designated space, we can access numerical data regarding their distances. This data may provide a new perspective on the selection of addresses and the possible pattern that was in the puzzle creator's mind.

If we can model the behavior of address selection, we will likely develop an analytical approach to better understand how the puzzles were designed.