I am grateful the forum has someone such as you to keep an eye on matters that need reading between the lines (rather than just the obvious). I see you still have your eyes placed in the key parts of the forum and I hope it stays that way 
As for some of the new merit source and how they will engage in merit abuse, it will unravel sooner or later. When it happens not only will their activity be scrutinised, many members will question the rationale why those accounts in particular were made merit source on the first place.
As for some of the new merit source and how they will engage in merit abuse, it will unravel sooner or later. When it happens not only will their activity be scrutinised, many members will question the rationale why those accounts in particular were made merit source on the first place.
If you see some kind of alternative or fraud, provide more compelling evidence.
And yes, if you are worried about so many merits being given unfairly, prepare your nervous system for even more stress, as the forum has recently received several merit sources that are sure to push their dozens, if not more, of alternatives. JollyGood is right in his instincts, as always.
And yes, if you are worried about so many merits being given unfairly, prepare your nervous system for even more stress, as the forum has recently received several merit sources that are sure to push their dozens, if not more, of alternatives. JollyGood is right in his instincts, as always.
this is why i was hoping for many merits source with few merits
there are many merits, many powers that can create abuse (not always)
As happened with bitcoin, the power to validate transactions has been divided among many peers
The fastest peer wins a prize
we must take an example from bitcoin