For instance,if someone is able to create wealth without creating more value, and it must be at the expense of another source.
It’s been assum as a zero-sum game and has negative effects to economy,that’s absolutely a bad ideology.
When it comes to a discussion about wealth, I usually tend to compare because wealth has no fixed value from one person to another. For example, if I have $ 1,000,000 and you have more than that, then my wealth is much smaller than what you have and always has no fixed value when compared from one person to another. Rich people do not put money in an account because they are looking for productive sources to produce more and a number of bills are already prepared by accumulating the total amount of money that has been prepared.
Everyone has their own assessment of wealth from their own perspective, but sometimes wealth can actually make someone lose control and forget the time that should be prioritized. It doesn't mean you can't be rich, but talking about life is not always about wealth because there are still many people who can live with simplicity.
Everyone has a different view on this and even everyone is different in terms of judging who is rich or not and I think that's okay.
For me, real wealth is how someone can control their money to be able to increase regardless of whatever they do but it is productive enough for them to increase the value of their assets, not just collecting as much money as possible because for me no matter how much we save money, it will still run out if we are not good at being able to turn the money into other things that can provide multiple benefits.