Rasmus Højlund is not a good striker while a big club like Manchester United needs to have a top-notch striker who is goal productive and stable in performances. Osimhen can help them to resolve issues at this important position but Rasmus Højlund can be kept and used as an alternative striker for Osimhen. During a very long season, Manchester United need to have more than one striker and Højlund is an acceptable substitution for Osimhen.
Manchester United doesn't even need Hojlund as a backup striker because they have more midfielders. Zirkzee should be the second striker while Hojlund should be put on sale to any interested team. I still don't understand why they signed Hojlund in the first place because he misses opportunities and can't create a chance for the team to win. Hojlund would have been the one sold to Napoli, instead of McTominay because he had more goals this season than Hojlund.
I agree, manchester city had a disappointing season
Pep Guardiola has done badly this season, we don't know all the reasons behind it, but after so many years that he has done well if a season doesn't go very well there's no point in crucifying him, let's wait and see what happens
Manchester City had a bad season because many of their key players have been doing well for the past five seasons, they didn't have the energy to compete last season, and most of them need time to rest because they are tired, whereas Manchester City doesn't have any other players. As we can see, Manchester City is now active in the transfer market, they have bought about 4 to 5 players who can improve their performance. I believe other teams should fear Manchester City comeback next season.