Because PSG outplayed Inter Milan and scored 5 goals against Inter Milan in the final, it makes you believe the Inter Milan squad was not strong enough to challenge PSG in the final, but this Barcelona squad you are saying would have been a stronger challenger for PSG failed to beat the Inter Milan squad that wasn't a strong challenger for PSG. What makes you believe the Barcelona squad would have been a stronger challenger for PSG? With the way Inter Milan and PSG perform in the UEFA Champions League competition, we were anticipating a tough UEFA Champions League final, but the final played out the way we didn't expect, so you can't really tell if the UEFA Champions League final could have gone the way we expected if it was PSG and Barcelona that played in the final.
I also really don't understand, how can a club that has lost be said to be greater and moreover able to overcome PSG in the final? If they were that great, then they would not lose, no matter what the conditions and no matter what happens. Inter won against Barcelona, meaning that at that match, Inter was much better than Barcelona. This is the fact. And in the final, PSG won against Inter, it means that at that match, PSG was much better than Inter. That's all, right? And the fact that the last season, PSG was the winner, it's a shame that this club is better than any other club.