I'm not against those user nor being jealous, no issue with them regarding they've received tons of merits for their posts even if they seem geneic| I'm just trying to understand whether the posts were made by them totally merit worthy or not.
Why, though? It doesn't really matter... your displeasure in how the posts got merits will not really affect anything. Complaining about merits given to accounts shouldn't be the sole basis for opening a thread. Instead, merit transfer information should be used to help solidify cases against potentially scammy accounts, in conjunction with other evidence. It is very rare that any type of action is taken against account solely because of their merit distribution habits.
Merit transactions should definitely be tracked and which user is giving merit to whom is definitely a matter of analysis. Because here many people are abusing merit and doing business of selling accounts by creating multiple accounts, while many people are working with multiple accounts in signature campaigns which is against the rules of the campaign.
According to the rules of the Signature Campaign, if someone has a small lack of merit due to the requirement of having 120 days of merit, then at that time they trade merit from their account in low quality posts or POA posts. Although a campaign manager understands these and does not accept them in the campaign. But what they are doing is completely against the rules of the forum. So they deserve to get the tag