Why do you expect an update from me, exactly? The update should come from you or Stake, not me. And... speaking of which, addressing your
post here, remind me again what attempt had you exhausted to get this resolved? AG? CG? GCB? Licensor?
The side effect of being put on ignore is... each of your threads are grayed.
The side effect of having so many threads against a casino is... people lost track of which is which and what is where and what about.
The side effect of being put on ignore and having too many threads is dot-dot-dot.
Mark the case as scammed,
Can't. There is no such label in my list.
because you and I both know AG, CG, and GCB are either partners in crime or hopelessly incompetent — even they’ve admitted as much in their own responses.
You and I? Uhh... I don't know that AG, CG, and GCB are partners in crime. So, that statement is a bit wrong. Just you.
So don’t play the referral game. We’ve exhausted those channels.
I don't. I don't refer anyone. Literally.
Let me also remind you, each thread I’ve posted addresses a separate abuse by Stake:
One is about withheld GDPR data.
One is about Rigged Games especially about their originals.
Another covers ghosting verified users post-deposit.
One shows how Stake redirects UPI through illegal vendors.
And this one? It’s about a monthly bonus arbitrarily denied, without notice or due process.
So no, this isn’t noise. It’s a pattern — and if you're too jaded or indifferent to track it, that's on you, not me.
And one prominent member advise me to just keep one or two threads of a clear spammers to make the list clean and save space. Of which... I fully intended to oblige.
If the side effect of being ignored is grayed threads, the side effect of ignoring evidence is losing credibility as a neutral mod.
Luckily I'm not mod. Yeaiii.
Don’t worry, I’ll continue to document every ignored complaint until someone has the courage to say it plainly:
Stake stole from a user. And no amount of dot-dot-dotting will erase that.
Wait... so that's all you do? Document things? And... spam threads? You didn't do any attempt to get your case resolved, not reaching to a mediator, pursuing legal path, writing petition, or whateverm and yet you summoned me here to give an update? What?
I appreciate your response, holydarkness, and I’ll address your points directly to clarify my efforts and intentions.
Efforts to Resolve the IssuesYou asked what attempts I’ve exhausted to resolve these issues with Stake.com. I’ve made multiple efforts to contact Stake’s support team directly through:
Email and Live Chat: I’ve submitted detailed requests regarding each issue— withheld GDPR data, rigged games, ghosting post-deposit, illegal UPI redirects, and denied bonuses. These attempts have either been met with complete silence or generic, unhelpful replies that fail to address the problems or provide the requested data.
Other Channels: I’ve also explored options like reaching out to mediators or regulators (e.g., AG, CG, GCB), but as I’ve noted, these entities have either been unresponsive or admitted their limitations in handling such cases effectively. This isn’t an assumption of collusion—it’s based on their own statements and lack of action.
I’m not just “documenting things” or “spamming threads” as you suggest. My goal is resolution, but Stake’s refusal to engage has left me with no choice but to escalate visibility here, hoping for accountability or intervention.
A Pattern of IssuesEach thread I’ve posted addresses a distinct abuse by Stake.com, supported by evidence I’ve shared repeatedly:
Withheld GDPR Data: Screenshots and logs of ignored requests for my personal data under GDPR.
Rigged Games: Statistical anomalies and player reports pointing to manipulation in Stake’s original games.
Ghosting Verified Users Post-Deposit: Records of verified accounts being ignored or blocked after deposits.
Illegal UPI Redirects: Transaction evidence showing payments rerouted through unauthorized vendors.
Arbitrarily Denied Bonuses: Documentation of a monthly bonus being revoked without explanation or process.
These aren’t redundant posts—they highlight a consistent pattern of behavior by Stake.com. I’ve kept them separate to ensure clarity, not to clutter the forum. If consolidating them into fewer threads would help, I’m open to that, but the issues themselves remain unresolved and serious.
Evidence and Forum RoleI’ve provided detailed evidence—screenshots, transaction records, communication logs—in multiple threads to make this visible to the community and moderators. Ignoring or dismissing this doesn’t invalidate it. I’m not asking you personally for an update, holydarkness, but rather seeking acknowledgment or action from anyone in a position to mediate or escalate this—moderators, mediators, or the forum itself. The “dot-dot-dot” side effects you mention don’t erase the need for a response to these documented complaints.
Moving ForwardI’m not here to spam or vent—I’m seeking justice for myself and others affected by these practices. If Stake.com continues to ghost me and regulators remain ineffective, documenting this publicly is my last resort to push for accountability. I’d welcome any guidance on a more effective path (e.g., a specific mediator or legal step I’ve overlooked), but silence from Stake and dismissal here only reinforce the problem.
Thanks for engaging, even skeptically—it keeps the conversation alive. I’ll keep documenting until there’s a resolution or someone steps up to call this what it is: Stake.com taking advantage of users.