Are you suggesting that we are getting a new ATH on or before the end of this month (June)  and/or are "we" going to make it to $120k?  And then the $140k to $150k would be within the next month or two after June? Something like that?


We might be a bit distracted by poverty level as compared to fuck you status, since surely no one should be considering poverty level to be fuck you status, even though surely there can be a lot of advantages in regards to receiving a passive income that is guaranteed (and no one to approve it or cut it off), versus potentially either working for an income or otherwise making sure that a person remains eligible for the income..

And, sure with investment as an income, there likely would be some basic money management duties, so even investment income might not be completely passive, unless there might be some ways that it is set up as a kind of passive distribution, but there is still accounting and likely moving around funds from time to time.


Over the years, I have had several instances in which I have created some side funds that would involve a kind of budget for "certain purposes," which means (meant) having some kind of a withdrawal plan for those set aside funds, and my experience has been similar in terms of my ongoing spending from the fund, but the fund has tendencies to grow faster than I am able to deplete it.. at least within the budgeting parameters that were established for the funds.

There have been a few exceptions to such bitcoin growth phenomena, but really no exceptions that have been really meaningful as compared with the observation that the funds are tending to grow faster than they are spent.

I even created some funds that were given parameters for certain designated others to spend within the parameters of the accounts, and I have even had some internal dilemmas since the parameters have tended to be too liberal and their budget ended up multiplying way beyond what I was considering to be fair parameters.. that kind of ends up overly spoiling the recipients (beneficiaries).

I had found a place that accepted bitcoin for the purchase of various electronics including Iphones, so I had a wallet that was set aside for such transactions, and so the wallet had gone up so much in value that the recipient (beneficiary) ended up getting a way better product than was initially in the plans........ so yeah sometimes adjustments end up needing to be made.

TLDR: Tending to be 1st world problems that are not bad ones to have.. but still sometimes creating dilemmas.


There's quite a bit of openness.. even though surely you are likely correct that guys may well gang up on various ones who are lacking in fit or coming around to just provoke.. and sure there continue to be some ongoing provokers.. .. but the world (and the thread) would not be as interesting if we just agreed on everything or even there can be some utility in some of the exaggerations or provocations to make points..



hahahaha.. yeah. lucky.. and holy shit, I had not realized that he jumped out.. That's amazing.. so luck and a bit of quick thinking.. I did notice that he was a bit of a muscular young guy. .so there is a bit of that. and say for example, he was sitting next to the exit and then maybe there were one or two people close enough to also jump out.. They may or may not be willing to jump....and I did another quickie research, and I saw an article in which it was not clear how close to the ground they were when he jumped.. so he might have had jumped at about the same time as the impact happened.


Not sure if I get this reference.. even though hey, I was just talking with some family members about my Uncle having had  a few instances of ghosting me and going through some story telling regarding those experiences in which the other family members could relate... so it wasn't just me..