Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Not taking risks can actually be good?
by
Cityhunter34
on 17/06/2025, 07:45:58 UTC
Found this article about not taking risks and it benefitting them. The story is not as relevant but what it said at the start was interesting to me. The risk-taking culture of gambling gets a lot of attention these days far from the floors of any casino: Not only in business — where a willingness to take a risk is an ordinary part of life, at least to a point — but in many other sectors, including government.

Zero risk-taking can lead to stagnation, but too much of it can lead to catastrophe, and the trick is in navigating the difference.


It got me thinking to how this can be applied in gambling. I know that almost all kinds of gambling require some sort of sacrifice and some risk taking but the levels vary. Do you reckon it is better to not risk that much in gambling and just keep playing low risk games and win even small amounts or do you always think that taking big risks is always the way to go?
One thing about risks is that sometimes it might likely result to more winnings, why sometimes it may likely lead you into more losses at last. So is quite a personal decision because as long as gambling is concerned each and everyone us here have different ways we view gambling. But as a gambler that knows the risks involved in gambling would never in any way think of risking huge amount of money in gambling because is pretty obvious that luck plays a significant role in gambling.