I believe that there are users in BitcoinTalk who probably have worked with casinos in the past. It would be helpful if they enter the discussion and give us a little information about this matter from the viewpoint of the casino, and tell us actually WHY casinos don't share the means in how the flag was made.
Those users also perhaps have an idea what the WHOLE story actually looks like, no?
Those users also perhaps have an idea what the WHOLE story actually looks like, no?
True, I actually did come across one of those complaints where holydarkness whom seem to have a good correspondence with some of the casinos support team or perhaps just one casino, can’t really place my fingers on that but yeah. In one of those complaints where he had to intervene, the user holydarkness did highlight that after reaching out to support and asked some specific questions, the response they gave was valid and didn’t differ from what the complainant narrated though pointed out the flaws in clear terms which was narrated to the complainant but, we weren’t let in on.
I’ve used the search function to look for that thread but, just couldn’t find it. It would have made more sense on that thread.
I do a rough count and I have ten casino representatives within reach of direct contact. Three were not that actively in touch, but reachable with a simple nudge if needed. I am also in active communication with [from the top of my head] three or four more through PM.
I don't follow the exact flow of the discussion that lead to me being mentioned here, but a quick glance tell me it's about how sportsbook [in general, not just Rollbit] flagged a user? Well, I ask five different casinos representatives, with two doesn't even have any issue current with their provider and I ask for "a favor" to help me get a better insight for neighboring casino.
They all came to same point, although different wordings: the sportbetting section has their own risk-management team. It's a "separate entity" that has power to call and make decision, where the casino can't overturn. One casino even try to intervene this by creating a second risk-assessment team to reevaluate that team's findings.
OK, but can we make a presumption that if an account is flagged, is it always high-probability that the user actually did something wrong, or is there high-probability for multi-account cases for false-positives?
Quote
Where is he/she, more probably a he, today?
He was busy yesterday updating his list and adding new feature, that took hours. Earlier today he was busy with IRL matters and can only address matters on the forum around this time [as always].
He might have some information about how the casinos actually think about the different issues in private and how they come to a decision to block a user/lock the account, and WHY the admins will not expose the reason for the block/lock.
Is this a talk about why casino doesn't explain in details for cases in general or is this specific about Rollbit and their latest approach? If it's the latter, I just from other thread addressing it to one of the player who got impacted by this approach. I can quote it here if needed, otherwise, it's this one.
Was he in BitcoinTalk's most popular mixer/tumbler campaign before it was closed?
The dark-green with pirate flag? Yes. Why do this brought to attention and how does it relate to the discussion?
No, it was the "CM" campaign. I don't mean anything offensive from it. It's merely how I remembered your name because it was the most popular signature campaigns in BitcoinTalk. The people who wore that signature were the smartest people in the forum.