That’s not entirely accurate. CoinJoins, in themselves, are not inherently problematic. Over the last seven years of CoinJoin history, only a handful of incidents—primarily during the pre-AML period of zkSNACKs—led to exchange freezes or bans. Once AML filtering was introduced, those incidents stopped. Now, we’re seeing them return for users participating in non-AML CoinJoin rounds. This clearly shows the problem isn’t CoinJoin as a concept, but rather when illicit funds and legitimate users are part of the same transaction.
This is based on your own anecdotal analysis, which is probably biased towards whatever makes Ginger look like a preferable alternative, but based on my own experiences getting flagged, exchanges don’t care if your coins come from an AML or non-AML coinjoin. AML filtering is really only for the benefit of developers, so they can make the argument that they were legally compliant. For the average user there is unlikely any difference in how their coins will be treated.