Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: Stake.com Censors Users, Blocks Withdrawals, and Now Steals Monthly VIP Bonuses
by
kingbj21
on 20/06/2025, 05:06:43 UTC
[...] and if there’s any resolution—especially from the complaint I filed—I’ll let you know right away. Please update the thread status on your list when you can. [...]

Will do that once FBI come with their findings and conclude their investigation. Not sooner, not later, exactly right after you update us with the result of the investigation [on the Sunday of course, that's when I update my list]. So, to spell things out for you: update us with your FBI pursuit, and I'll reflect that to my list. Without it, there is no basis to update the current status to any other label. Understandable? Good.

[...] and if there’s any resolution—especially from the complaint I filed—I’ll let you know right away. Please update the thread status on your list when you can. [...]

And how exactly this [once again] turned into my fault?


@holydarkness, You’re spinning my words into knots, cherry-picking what fits your script while dodging the real fight. I never said the FBI’s probing my missing monthly bonus—that’s your leap, not mine. Those bonuses? Just bait for high rollers like me, a Platinum III VIP who dumped $70,000 and $2,688 into Stake, only to get $6.57 when $30 was promised. Stake’s empire thrives on hooking losers, then mocking them on livestreams—something you conveniently sidestep.

My FBI complaint targets bigger fish—organized greed, not just my payout. I won’t spill the details or evidence; handing criminals the playbook is a rookie move, and I’ve seen enough fallout to know better. You want proof? Look at Stake’s mandatory KYC rollout—universal, sudden, paired with one-time bonuses to mop up years of sloppy, shady dealings. Pressure’s working, but don’t give me a pat on the back; they’re scrambling, not reforming.

New games and fixed originals? Sure, progress. But we need independent audits, transparent disclosures, and ironclad safeguards—not backroom tinkering. Instead, I get your deflection, your referee act between users and casinos. You’ve admitted you don’t gamble—never felt a six-figure loss or an account lockout with canned support replies. So maybe you’re less a voice of reason and more a curator of optics, not solutions.

Own it, and I’d respect the hustle. But playing neutral while sidelining victims? That’s damage control, not justice. Maybe launch “Holy’s Arbitration Service”—might outshine casino support. Until then, you’re part of this ecosystem, not above it. If you won’t back the real complaints, at least quit tripping up those of us shouting them.

Thanks. — KingBJ21 Still standing. Still loud. Your list can choke on it.