Therefore, it would be better if bitcoin functioned as something that Satoshi had intended from the start where its role was only an alternative option, not the core, so that some unexpected things including the worst possibilities would not happen.
Although bitcoin's progress is very good and their development is extraordinary, we must be aware that in the end the risk always remains for bitcoin and the main function of bitcoin is also not as a replacement but an alternative, so just focus there.
When forcing to replace fiat in a country, it is clearly very risky for the country itself. It does not mean that in this context, confidence in bitcoin is fading, but we also cannot force it too much as if everything can be done by bitcoin and we certainly know that when Satoshi said that bitcoin was only an alternative, of course this was in very good consideration and had been thought out very carefully.
I believe that Bitcoin's fate is already destined. It's going to be the digital gold, a form of asset which will regularly be used for reserves. If you see, governments are slowly making Bitcoin part of their strategic reserves and every day, new companies are following this trend.
Believe me, no country will try to replace fiat with Bitcoin. Even El Salvador didn't do that. Bitcoin, as a currency is very unusable for the country and its population but it's also very dangerous because of its volatility. It usually goes up but it also goes down sometimes and this creates a very unstable environment for people. Imagine that you are about to pay for a heart surgery, which costs $10,000 and tomorrow Bitcoin's price fell by 10%, that's a huge drop for a citizen. The country and people needs a stable currency and an easy payment method.