In this concern I think it is better to have a tendency to take risks. There is no possibility of winning in gambling without risk. If someone wants to avoid risk, it is a personal matter because the gambler himself is able to understand the level of his financial condition. In terms of betting, I have seen in my betting that when I cashed out on a bet, my result was win. For which I also regretted it. Again, when I held on to win a bet, I also lost. For this reason, I think that in gambling, I have to take risks because luck favors risk takers. I find it difficult to win if I gamble without taking risks. It is better to hold to a certain state without the rise and fall of emotions. No one knows whether a bet will win or lose. If you can bet with money that you can afford to lose, then it is better to accept the win or loss, whatever comes.
You are right that luck is always with the risk taker. Someone may avoid taking risks and play defensive gambling but it may give him good results in the long run but he lags behind in terms of winning. At times to my defensive attitude in betting such as keeping a small amount of money and being inattentive, my winnings were not promising. Most of the bets I lost but the bets where I was more focused and had a large amount of allocation had a chance of winning and I won a few times. Analyzing and increasing my attention before betting can increase your winnings.
For the poor gambler taking risks is more detrimental to him financially because he does not understand the intrinsic value of gambling and his allocation is limited he may go more insolvent.
The risk must be justified.When a player wants to win but doesn’t consider the possibility of losing and t's blind reliance on intuition, it’s great if your intuition is good, but you can still lose, and you need to be prepared for that too. We take many actions in life that involve risk. Gambling itself is a form of risk. Still, there should be boundaries that one shouldn’t cross.