This is one of the biggest misnomers to be applied to any type of new technology. The idea that a machine attempting to emulate a human being can further "humanize" its output is absurd. The machine is doing all the work -- there is no human beings involved in "humanization." Thus a more proper term would be "shitifier" as it makes output more shitty albeit in a very robotic way.

As far as the subject of this thread is concerned, I don't think the mods want more work of having to go out of their way to determine what is or isn't AI content. It is already hard enough to get some posters to admit they are using AI. The ultimate offense that determines if a post should be removed is whether or not it falls into the category of "spam" in the eyes of the moderators.