This is to reply in general to the entire development of the thread after I leave for RL.
Actually... it can't be OP's remaining fund, thus he wager all or to make it round, because I happen to know his deposit amount. Unless... the casino indeed manipulate the data, of which OP can always prove/disprove by showing us the screenshot of his deposits and the TXID. You'll kill two birds with one stone, OP: explaining that the odd number is indeed because due to harmless reason and not due to telltale of arbing, simply related to preference from your deposit, as well as prove that what my contact supply me with falsified info.
Otherwise, why the odd wager? If we may ask? Not arbing, right?
Moving to next topic, it'll be why I am trying to determine whether that's an arb or not. Well, it's because I'm trying to find middle ground. As always, I'm here not in the capacity to pass judgment or deliver verdict, or to rate, simply to see a case to an end. One side says he's not arbing, another add I trust blindly, the other side, the casino, proves to me with evidence of arbing. Thus, one possible way to see an end to it is by meeting in the middle: void what was believed to be arbing and return what's legally won.
Sounds fair to me, to meet in the middle, that's the best solution I can think of. Simple, but effective and fair, given the casino have policy of arbing, and there was indeed a bet that rather had characteristics of arbing. Hence, I asked if it looks like arbing or just me, so I can draft my "proposal" to them to meet OP in the middle in the condition that the overseers majorly agrees.
But uhh... yeah, that all will be no longer necessary and matter to me.
holydarkness, he does make a good point. You have to stop believing everything the casino and casino reps tell you. All 5 of your contacts were wrong about odds providers. Now you are saying XYes showed proof of arbitrage betting. They didn’t show you any proof.
Getting flagged doesn’t mean arbitrage. It could be CLV (closing line value). You will get flagged for CLV and that’s what most likely happened.
Amuse and enlighten me at the same time, then. I ask five different casino representatives about sportsbook providers, and they were all wrong? All five of them? Why is that and who or what should I believe then, and why?
For the record, the proof they're showing me for this case is their version of the similar-fashioned proof shown by other casinos. I should not believing that proof too? Thus, the evidence shown by other casinos in different cases should not be trusted too? And why is that? Safe to assume the other casinos also fabricate evidence of arbing? In a very similar fashion? How's that achievable? All casinos, has similar fashioned evidence, only differ slightly. Is it because they conspire behind the screen? Or what? Again, so who and what to believe and why?
And, last: when you said no migraine, it's because you're expecting me to have the casino pay the player, otherwise, when an evidence showed me other thing that'll make it rather justified to confiscate half or full fund [their ToS covered this] and I look for a way to find middle ground and question things, those "no headache" no longer valid?
I can't see the asterix on that statement, *as long as you make it in favor to player.
Oh, by the way, yes, unlike above section that no longer matter to me, I am expecting an answer for each and every question I raised to you here.