in my experience it's not a decent scanner, it has a lot of false negatives, so I would just avoid using it
gptzero is the one that has given me the most satisfaction at the moment, exactly the best even if you can't use it much, since it requires payment
but couldn't theymos buy it and use the API to check every post inserted? is bad idea?
It's not the best scanner but not the worst either. Usually, if a post is AI written it'll detect it with no issues, but may flag a few posts as false positives from time to time. It's free and with unlimited scans, but as everyone else also suggested, it's to be used in combination with the other tools.
I responded to this post last week and it caught my eye. It’s uncommon to see a legendary account using AI to generate posts, I would like to hear his response. So far I haven’t seen any posts in his account history that is AI written. The post I quoted looks human written but the source link clearly shows that it’s gotten from ChatGPT. I want to know, are cases like this given a pass?
From my understanding, the user you quoted is taking ideas on what to write from ChatGPT, or simply sourcing links through it. I didn't see a repeated pattern from his previous posts, so I don't believe it's such a big deal.