It feels like there's something wrong, he should either tag both of you or not tagging at all. Let's see what he will do.
Speculative dramatization is not helpful. I am very busy and my activity is sporadic. I essentially almost never read this section. I didn't know I was included in DT2, and I didn't even know much about this system before seeing this topic. At this point I would like to say thank you to the user yahoo62278. Had he not sent me a DM about this thread, it is very likely that I would not have seen it for some time. 
I've looked into the situation again. The reason why I didn't leave a tag on dkbit98 is because of this post.
But i expect @dkbit98 can give acceptable reasoning why he think LN is centralized, so i'll wait him to reply about it either on this or that thread.
After reading this and knowing that the user has received many merits, I decided to give them a chance to explain themselves and expected a profound answer. The answer never came. As I was busy with Lightning, I practically forgot about this. I have also left him a Tag now.As for the feedback, there is no chance that I will remove it. The only correct thing to do is to discuss things that you have (real) knowledge in, everything else should be ignored until you have gained sufficient understanding of the topic for you to be able to make statements about it. You're welcome to participate by asking questions, but that's the extent of it. As soon as you start making unfounded statements you have started doing harm. Educating people and getting them to use Bitcoin is hard enough, and it is made even more difficult by the vast amount of misinformation about nearly every aspect of Bitcoin circulating on the internet.
That's better. I still can't really comment on breaking the link between funds, as I don't really know the inner workings of LN (nodes). I know bits and pieces, but that's not enough. And I think that's kinda the point: we've seen many people posting incorrect information on the tech board, usually trying to earn Merit or they're just after those signature earnings. Either way, it's better not to have the wrong information on the tech boards.
That is also a point of the issues. You can't comment so simply on these things because the reality is very complex and nuanced. A lot of users are just repeating surface information that they've seen somewhere else. Usually it is not based on theoretical research or empirical knowledge, and as such is almost always wrong. Some posts will be wrong in the details, others will be completely wrong but the point is the same. One should not comment on it.