If we want to split hairs and pick apart everything people say, then satofan44 could also be given neutral or possibly even negative feedback for defending shady scam exchange ChangeNOW.
ChangeNOW isn’t just over complying with regulations, they outright scam people by selectively enforcing KYC and then ghosting users who actually provide their personal information in hopes of recovering their funds. It’s just one of various fronts used by Evercode Lab to scam people.
Resorting to immediately tagging people over an opinion that we feel is misleading or incorrect isn’t the best approach. It’s better to counter with facts and hope that people will become better informed.
Yet another lie posted without reading the topic. Take a hint from the topic title "Users who spread false/fake/unhelpful information on technical board". I am not defending anyone in particular, I am discussing the topic at hand and trying to understand what is going on. Being emotional and making logically fallacious statements does not advance your position. If you have been scammed by someone, that does not change the fact that I was not scammed by the same someone. If on the other hand someone thinks that LN is centralized, that does not change the fact that this is a lie and that it is not centralized. ChangeNOW isn’t just over complying with regulations, they outright scam people by selectively enforcing KYC and then ghosting users who actually provide their personal information in hopes of recovering their funds. It’s just one of various fronts used by Evercode Lab to scam people.
Resorting to immediately tagging people over an opinion that we feel is misleading or incorrect isn’t the best approach. It’s better to counter with facts and hope that people will become better informed.
Well, does that mean that op deserved the given feedback from your own judgement?
Like I said, he was claiming LN-transactions happen offline. That's not true, which makes the feedback factually correct.