you realize that this is a truly absurd argument. You're not arguing anything, you're just saying that what you believe is true because it is.
You had 50 ways shown and proven the prefix theory is absurd itself.
It was also proven why it "wins", and why this criteria is absurd (you literally had one explanation just a few posts above).
If you think the 51st time people will bother again, I guess it's better off for you to believe that your topic is not absurd, and is also valid simply because no one responds to it.
Food for thought.
what I say, you realize that I could argue the same to invalidate your arguments without specifying absolutely anything, that is the art of debate, and in debates I know all the existing tactics, even the low ones, which are the ones you generally use in your comments, which are literally going to a topic and giving a generalized argument that is ambiguously correct but not for the specific topic, which in principle creates uncertainty that you could be right, that is why in rckangaroo retired coder tells you that you do not know something, in Mark1 you talk about things that have nothing to do with the topic, and you theorize about supposed things that you do better but that you never reveal.