Let me know when you contribute something even halfway interesting to the forum that is nothing more than pure criticism, because even though you disagree and suffer with everything that people post on the forum, and in the few cases in which you do not criticize them directly you allude to the fact that you would do it better, I do not understand why you are still here, if I were you I would be tired of going to the jungle to teach monkeys to read if I knew that it was an impossible mission for me.
Come on, don't cry so hard just cuz no one cares about your "probabilistic brute-force" undoubtedly-best-to-be-used kindergarten script, that you want real experts to congratulate you for. Well, maybe bib does, the expert cryptographer researcher who can't even count H160 bits properly, and will go to great lengths to show that he's right (when he's obviously just digging his hole deeper), so my bad.
Since you're looking for a Nobel, they don't hand that for mathematical breakthroughs, like breaking elliptic curves over prime fields (and two hash functions) with some AI script that runs fancy analysis on flawed principles, and compares performance by using sports gambling methodologies.
Now, on a serious note, you won't really find any criticism in your prefix theory, simply because there is nothing to criticize. Go ahead, and implement it in an actual real scenario, see how well it goes for you. Then, come back with actual results (if there are any). Not the other way around, which is simply misleading people into actually thinking that it somehow works, based on the words that you are suggesting (like "undoubtedly" but with zero actual proofs to back it up).