I don't know why some guys continue to make the point that source income might not be enough.
Generally speaking, we should be able to assume that it is better to have both a source income and a steady income.
I don’t know what you guys mean by source income, care to educate me on that?
Or should I just assume the reverse of the other which is steady income making source income an income source that isn’t steady or discontinuous.
Part of the point is that you don't need a source income or steady income to buy bitcoin, even though it tends to be better to have a source income and a steady income.. but it is not a requirement.
Having discretionary funds, even if it is merely ONLY $10 and one time (like the cigarette example that I keep stating) is enough to get started buying bitcoin.
Each time a person assesses whether or not he can buy bitcoin, he should be able to assess that he is investing from discretionary funds and that his investment plan for each time he buys bitcoin is 4-10 years or longer.
Sure, if something goes wrong.. then a guy mibht have to cash out of his bitcoin in less than 4 years, yet the plan should be to invest for 4-10 years or longer, each time any bitcoin is bought, whether it is $10 or $100 or whether it is weekly amounts of $10 or weekly amounts of $100 or other frequencies and/or amounts, even if the frequency of buying and the amount of bitcoin bought (dollars spent) might not be consistently the same.
One who is enable to earn is one who can make plans, not just plans on how to spend their earnings but investment plans as well. It’s always left for you to prioritize certain things and types of investments including Bitcoin if you do believe in a future where your investments could roll in and save the days.