For example, not every player faces long losing streaks. If someone places bets and keeps detailed records, and they see that their losing streaks usually do not exceed 3 to 5 matches on average, those would be their worst runs. In that case, they can manage their bankroll in a way that allows them to feel safe, keeping a solid deposit buffer. And if losses alternate with wins, they can apply this strategy. But honestly, I am not sure if it makes much sense. If a player has good stats without long losing streaks, they can simply adjust by increasing the odds they choose, and it would be a safer approach for their bankroll. That is just my opinion.
I came to the conclusion that no strategy shows itself positively over a long period of time. I can't even remember the number of different options. In the end, the deposit was lost anyway. Yes, of course, there were great moments when I managed to hit a big win, but this was only a couple of times over many years. Were my expectations met? I can't answer this question right away. Most likely, the money lost is much greater than the money won. These are the conclusions I made.