Whatever AI program that was used to assist you in writing this insipid nonsense, OP, it sucks. I'm not buying that these are your words for a single minute--this pseudo-blog style of writing is exactly what the output would be after a shitposter input a load of flyblown horse dung..
Except the OP is using other tools to humanise his posts, but I checked this original post in three different AI detectors from the
AI Spam Report Reference Thread:
GPTZeroSapling QuillbotAnd the results were that it was written by a human. Maybe OP should clarify how he wrote the post.
Apart from those, I have also passed it through copyleaks. With those results I don't see that the OP has to explain anything. The Sceptical Chemist probably didn't like the OP's style at all, which is very respectable, and confused it with generated AI.
On the issue in question, I would not like to see the issue so politicised, but if it were not, it probably would not have gained the importance it has today. It seems to me that I am in a catch-22 situation.