Being overly aggressive only means one thing which is; you will have to likely invest more than you can afford to loss. So it's very much important that we identify the level in which our investment is within a level that we can take whatever happens thereafter. This implies that we should invest solely from our discretionary income or moreover if you want to be aggressive you can then use up to 90% of your discretionary income that we can call aggressive investments but if you do an aggressive investment outside your discretionary income it will likely end up that you will have to struggle psychologically or financial probably leading to tempering with your investment.
Buying aggressively all the time is not a good idea. Because if a person buys aggressively every time, if he needs some amount of money, then maybe that person can get very broke. For example, if a person invests with 80% or 90% of his discretionary income all the time, then when there is a small financial crisis, he will have to depend on his emergency fund or take a loan from someone. But yes, how much % to invest is completely their personal choice. But I think it is right to invest 35% to 45% of your discretionary income. Because it will not be too aggressive and not too low.
You can continue to buy continuously by adopting the DCA method and if you see a decline in the market, you can buy aggressively if you want.
Aggressive buying helps an investor to grow his portfolio rapidly to reach his accumulation stage, in as much as you have what it takes to buy aggressively without it affecting your investment, since it is important for us to manage our aggressive buying of Bitcoin, because there are some persons that are not really prepared for aggressive buying of Bitcoin but just because friends are doing it, they want to do, such persons will end up sell of his investment or gets stocked when he can no longer have funds to purchase Bitcoin any more.
according to JJG,There surely can be some differing opinions in regards to how to manage aggressiveness so that we stay within bounds of aggressiveness and without overdoing it or even saying that we are being aggressive, yet really we are being whimpy since we are holding back too much value for dips that might not end up happening.
There are guys who like to proclaim that they are being smart because they are holding back value for dips, yet it may well end up playing out that they are being overly whimpy with such strategy that may well result with their having less bitcoin than what they would have had otherwise had if they had persistently, consistently, regularly, ongoingly and even aggressively bought bitcoin.