Experts treat gambling as a source of income, so they bet on themselves because they’re confident in what they’re doing and believe they can be profitable. These are the ones who raise a realistic bankroll and set realistic targets. let's say on average, if their funds grow by 10% in a month, they’re already happy because over time, it compounds.
Meaning, they don’t cash out their profits right away, they reinvest it as additional bankroll.
Now I’d like to ask you.. as a gambler, would you already be happy earning just 10% profit from your total bankroll?
10% of the capital is good in gambling.
But compound is not a good thing to do in gambling, I would not do that, because you can lose control in one game session and lose everything, unless you only play sports betting where every decision takes time to process until finally deciding which betting option.
If this month you can get 10% of the capital next month, it is not certain that you can repeat it, so compound is not something that players should do.
You don't understand what is compounding and your whole post is wrong. You absolutely should compound. Compounding your bankroll lowers your chance of going bust. What you should not do is compound your bet size, that is something very different. If your bets are currently 0.1% of your bankroll, then when you increase the bankroll it should stay the same or it should even decrease accordingly. Having a bigger bankroll increases your chance of winning better money and decreases the chance of bankruptcy.