I just got 100x multiplier but there was bit of boring disappointment with only $0.2 bet and in most rounds with bigger bet it didn't give anything until it just kept decreasing the balance. There is conspiracy theory in my mind that slots will only make it easier for players to win with small bet but tend to make it harder to win with big bet even though some people managed to win with their big bet, by the way this is the first time Pragmatic with the Starlight Princess game has given I big multiplier.
Many gamblers may agree with you but in fact we cant prove it that we will get less chance to win big in slot when our basebet is bigger.
I played slot game a lot, there are many cases when I lose with small bet continuously but there were few times when I won nice multiplier with bigger basebet.
It is pure luck for me, we may get nice multiplier with both small and big basebet as well as we may win nothing with both small and bigger basebet.
Anyway, startlight princess is not better than gates of olympus based on my own experience, this is why I rarely played startlight princess and I prefer gates of olympus.
Yes, indeed we will not be able to prove anything because this is game and what is in everyone mind is only about the perception of each opinion based on suggestions for each result obtained from each playing session. I also feel that slots are one of the games of luck that really cannot be guessed or solved in any way, of course only relying on luck and unlike some other games that can still be analyzed with skill and this is also one of the challenges that always brings everyone to continue playing even though they have received many lose from slots. Regarding the gates of olympus, it is one of the pragmatic games that I avoid, so far from my experience game but there has been no surprising history of win.