Sure, but on 2025-07-02 address gets dusted with OP_RETURN saying "Our client has taken constructive possession of it" and then two days later on 2025-07-04 it gets emptied, after staying dormant for 14 years since 2011. I think the timing couldn't be more suspicious
I missed the timing indeed, I thought the dust spam happened after it was emptied, but it happened earlier. The link in their OP_RETURN doesn't work, it needs "-" instead of "_". It sounds like they're trying to make up some legal mumbo jumbo to justify
stealing 6 billion dollars worth of Bitcoin, giving the owner 90 days to respond.
How is this not
the subject of the week on Bitcointalk?