Re: Buy Buy Buy or Sell Sell Sell?

Being overly aggressive only means one thing which is; you will have to likely invest more than you can afford to loss. So it's very much important that we identify the level in which our investment is within a level that we can take whatever happens thereafter. This implies that we should invest solely from our discretionary income or moreover if you want to be aggressive you can then use up to 90% of your discretionary income that we can call aggressive investments but if you do an aggressive investment outside your discretionary income it will likely end up that you will have to struggle psychologically or financial probably leading to tempering with your investment.

Buying aggressively all the time is not a good idea. Because if a person buys aggressively every time, if he needs some amount of money, then maybe that person can get very broke. For example, if a person invests with 80% or 90% of his discretionary income all the time, then when there is a small financial crisis, he will have to depend on his emergency fund or take a loan from someone. But yes, how much % to invest is completely their personal choice. But I think it is right to invest 35% to 45% of your discretionary income. Because it will not be too aggressive and not too low.

You can continue to buy continuously by adopting the DCA method and if you see a decline in the market, you can buy aggressively if you want.

Buying aggressively to build a bitcoin portfolio is a great idea though but you first have to put your financial income sources in order and what I mean by this is that you must strive to have a multiple sources of income that are reliable and considerate to be able to have to strong financial flow that could help you buy aggressively even while using the DCA approach. With multiple income sources you can dedicate a single source for your bitcoin portfolio accumulation, while direct other sources towards everyday demands and emergency needs. Imho, you can't successfully maintain aggressive buying with a single income source because you can't always pend other real life demands.

I agree with you, multiple streams of income gives you a
More financial leverage as you buy aggressively, multiple streams balances the quest to invest more, because you don't have to be dilly-dallying with DCA strategy because you will be investing from a comfort zone. Multiple streams gives more flesh to both your discretionary income and your emergency funds, this is not to say that people will single source of income cannot do all of these but multiple stream places you at a more advantageous position.