Just a question for some if you have the answers. I see sll the scam accusations towards the casinos for holding funding and/or blocking accounts on KYC failure. So is the casino keeping these funds that players are winning? And is this why there is such an up surge in the KYC bs everyone has been dealing with?
Obviously the providers aren't aware of the scam accusations and KYC denials so safe to assume they are clueless on the payout? Now isn't the provider just as liable to pay the player their winnings as the host platforms?
It is not the duty of casino game provider to monitor which casino is been accused of scam or neither preventing it's users from having access to funds simply because they failed to provide the necessary documents to complete KYC, but, it is the duty of the Game provider to provide a conducive atmosphere for the smooth gambling process of both users and the casino owners. Because according to research, it is well known that the primary duty of a casino provider is to provide smooth integration to host games, and likewise provide data encryption, fraud protection, and anti-hacking systems. Including providing tools for casinos to monitor player behavior, Revenue tracking, game performance and fraud detection.