You talk as if understanding quantum computing is irrelevant, but it’s exactly this kind of technical denialism that could come at a high cost.
This is the exact opposite of what my post states! I am saying that pretty much everyone who brings about this fearmongering does it because they have absolutely zero understanding of quantum computers. Such people should keep quiet on these matters, as such posts are FUD.
No one here is saying quantum computers will break Bitcoin tomorrow,
Plenty of people are, some even state that it is already happening.
Some of us actually study the topic deeply, based on real scientific papers, QNN tests, and current hardware limitations.
One in a million, and such people are not the people that my post is referring to.
While you mock quantum computing as a “fairy tale,” governments and trillion-dollar companies are investing billions in it. Is that just another “psyop” too?
For now it is a fairy tale, the same way that fusion energy is a fairy tale.
Sure, BIP 324 is important. But so is future-proofing Bitcoin. It’s not either-or. It’s all of it. If Bitcoin is supposed to last for centuries, it has to survive threats that haven’t even materialized yet.
How about we solve threats that are here today first instead of solving threats that will happen at an unknown time in the future?
We know SHA-256 and ECDSA won’t be safe forever. And no, that’s not FUD, it’s projection grounded in science, not faith.
Correct, and what should we do about it
here? Write 10000 posts, out of which 9500 will be campaign shiposts, 400 will be FUD and maybe 100 posts will have reasonable and educated content? Wait for the cryptographic solutions to be developed and for them to mature, and then we can apply them. "Developers" are not the kind of people that are able to solve this problem.