Just a question for some if you have the answers. I see sll the scam accusations towards the casinos for holding funding and/or blocking accounts on KYC failure. So is the casino keeping these funds that players are winning? And is this why there is such an up surge in the KYC bs everyone has been dealing with? Obviously the providers aren't aware of the scam accusations and KYC denials so safe to assume they are clueless on the payout? Now isn't the provider just as liable to pay the player their winnings as the host platforms?
The provider doesn't know that the player has funds withheld at casino X or Y, because it's up to the casino to decide what to do with its customers' accounts. The saddest part is that many casinos are only strict with KYC when the customer wins a lot of money or has been winning consistently. The casinos' argument is always "we detected suspicious activity and your account is under investigation."
Months or months later, they contact the customer to inform them that they were banned and all funds were confiscated because the casino's support team detected too many accounts. There are few cases in which the casino at least returns the person's deposit. With this type of accusation, it's almost impossible for the customer to prove their innocence.