Thank you for understanding what I am trying to achieve here.
Let me try to pull other "stunt" as above matter brings us nowhere... at least not to the point I am trying to achieve. I'm not sure the casino is willing, because TBH and IIRC, yours is the first case I am handling and "bridging" with them, so they probably are not as confident as other casinos in sharing details with me. But suppose they're willing, do you give me further and every consent to share details of your account with me?
I'm not comfortable with sharing private details of my account including name, email etc. I also don't see how that's relevant to the case.
I'm perfectly willing to share every detail regarding to betting and I don't think the sportsbook needs my permission to make any wrongdoing on my side public, which I'm sure they would if they had anything of substance. They're not under an NDA of any kind. They don't need my permission to defend their own reputation. Also nothing is stopping them from communicating with you and saying "the player abused the sporstbook in such an such a way, but we'd need explicit consent of the player to discuss it further".
I'd also like to remind you that they've paid out the rest of my balance which was significant. If they had a legit claim they would have confiscated it.
[...]
Uhh, I don't want to be rude and have zero intention to offend you when I said this [and I said this to a lot of other people who give their consent to me to inquire about details and/or to bridge with KYC related matters]: the details of your life doesn't interest me. I'm simply here to get to the bottom of the cases. And for this particular case, to achieve that, as your case is about bets, I am aiming for betting history, not your name and country of origin and other aspect in that regards [that's for other issues that's not related to this matter].