If you guys can remember, there was an old topic on this board that say that gamblers can not win a casino. While some people believed that that was true, some gamblers also opposed that statement because they believed that sometimes a gambler can win the casino. They believed that if a gambler wins a jackpot, he or she have won the casino, could that be true?
Even if the person does not win a jackpot, he can be said to have won against the casino if he is ahead of his initial bankroll after his session. I think it does not need to win a huge amount of money or win a huge jackpot in order to consider to have won against the casino. Just being ahead is good enough unless his advantage is nullified and his bankroll is emptied.
Some people can win a huge amount as jackpota but yet the amount that they won can not be compared to how much money they have lost in entire life while gambling, can you say such person has won the casino because they won a jackpot?
True, in order to say a person had won against the casino, his total winnings must surpass his total losses.
If you believe that sometimes, gamblers can also win the casino, kindly drop all the explanation of why you have such a believe.
I believe that gamblers can beat the casino as long as he stop while ahead. Playing for too long may emptied his bankroll because housed edge may kick in and series of losses may increase overtime resulting for the players loss.