Just a question for some if you have the answers. I see sll the scam accusations towards the casinos for holding funding and/or blocking accounts on KYC failure. So is the casino keeping these funds that players are winning? And is this why there is such an up surge in the KYC bs everyone has been dealing with? Obviously the providers aren't aware of the scam accusations and KYC denials so safe to assume they are clueless on the payout? Now isn't the provider just as liable to pay the player their winnings as the host platforms?
I’m not referring to those shitty casinos that usually do this kind of thing to keep users funds deliberately; but what I have seen is that they’d calculate to see if the user is on the winning side if he is then they usually keep the entire thing as some kind of reimbursement for the winnings the user have and then just let them go with their initial deposits and if it’s true that the user isn’t able to complete kyc genuinely then I think that kind of treatment isn’t cruel… It only becomes cruel when the casino or provider deliberately refuses to verify the account when the user submits a legit document but for a fake document or incomplete documents then it is okay.