There are some sets of players who are not lucky in winning trophies like that, but that doesn't mean that the players who have won them are better than those who have not yet won one. Let's take Kane as an example. It was clear that Kane was a better striker than some of the strikers who were winning trophies, but he just wasn't lucky, mainly because of the team he was in.

If we are to judge players, it is their contribution to the team that we need to focus on. For example, if we compare Mbappe's contribution with Dembele's, it's clear that Mbappe is still better than Dembele. Winning trophies sometimes comes down to opportunities; it's not solely about a single player's contribution. It's very possible that even if Dembele were absent from PSG squad, PSG might still win their Champions League. PSG does not rely on Dembele.Even this season, despite Mbappe not winning any trophies, his contribution to Real Madrid is something no one can deny.but anyone say dembele is better than mbappe this season i may not deny but that shoild be for this only season.