You've been waiting for BTC to fall to $50k for over a year, with or without an irregular flat.
And your only mention of a bullish alternative count is:
"that the bearish option will be invalidated above $114k."
This isn't Elliott, this is your bearish thread.
The norm in Elliott, especially in long-term terms, is to have two alternatives, one bullish and one bearish.
You've been using only one for a year: going for $50k.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5485551.msg64037630#msg64037630
And your only mention of a bullish alternative count is:
"that the bearish option will be invalidated above $114k."
This isn't Elliott, this is your bearish thread.
The norm in Elliott, especially in long-term terms, is to have two alternatives, one bullish and one bearish.
You've been using only one for a year: going for $50k.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5485551.msg64037630#msg64037630
This is not my "bearish thread"
Personally, I think bitcoin may surpass the marketcap of gold; and, if that were to happen at today's gold price, then bitcoin would be around $1,200,000
https://companiesmarketcap.com/assets-by-market-cap/
It won't reach 1200,000 this year, or next.
However, it could rise to 200,000 or 300,000.
I'm here to see some lines drawn pointing upwards, to try to predict the new ATH, in date and price, but we've only been aiming for 50,000 for a year now.
No alternative count.
Two days left to see if BTC closes the week above $114,000.