This is the second time I've read about banning gambling this week in countries, but is that really the way forward? I guess not. It's just like manipulating people to control them into doing exactly what the lawmakers want. Gambling is an adult activity, there should be freedom in doing that. Still, I understand their plight, which is "sanity," and truly, it's the best. However, weighing the two sides is the best way to go, which makes stricter regulation better than banning it outright.
The country do not want to ban gambling but they want to go for stricter way to reduced gambling advertisment like what the OP posted:
Did you read this:
Due to this, many lawmakers proposed a total ban on gambling, which was opposed by various sectors due to the tax implications and job losses, leading them to suggest a stricter restriction.
It wasn't the first time I read that individual senators, lawmakers and politicians are severely frowning on gambling and proposing a ban instead of stringent regulation that will make gambling more sane and accountable in the country, which was what prompted my initial reply.
I read everything.
I only meant that the country did not ban gambling, It was only proposed. I understood you and you are not wrong either but just letting you understand the part of the post that gambling is not banned in the country but proposed. Banning was not accepted but this still led to stricter regulations on gambling.