There is a social phenomena that has to do with sexual relationships between people who are practicing their free agency in a way that is meant to be publicly positioned for the potential to influence as many others to participate as possible. That has to do with the protection of LGBTQ activities and rights to legal status which includes the benefits of medical subsidies through the complex systems made possible by the way the US government has inserted itself into the industry. Now I'm not an experienced professional nor all that well studied in many of the aspects of the debate which is being dealt to those who wish to make it a democracy deal, but there are aspects of dealing with those who are generally outspoken enough to even get to having a conversation on the topic. Many of the positions seem to be grossly generalized to win public appeal but a counterpart to the acceptance of such a legal status for the persons behaviors included in the acronym is not present. It seem to me that it should be part of the position of those generally covering the expanding legal rights for anyone's personal intimate relationships. Not that I even believe for a second that government regulation or policy should have anything to do with the family's organization in a legal sense, but since it does then lets get a key component of the legal rights available to people back into consideration for change. That has to do with the legal status of polygamous families. Since those are prohibited within the US, why would that not be part of the legal championing that LGBTQ organisations include?