I have come to understand that the countries we mostly refers to as world powers or the big five like USA, Russia, China, Germany etc all deals with nuclear weapons that post treats, fears and minority orientations to other countries. Countries like Arab, Iran, Irag, Pakistan and lots more have powers but do not actually have nuclear weapons to withstand or fight the big fives countries rather it has always be a thing of negotiations for resources, boundaries and scales rather than fights and win battles to know who control the world.
Africa has millions of people but can't boast of any weapons except retires guns and stainless used and abandoned by America's and Europeans, and that's why Africa can not stand for their rights like Burkinafaso today,
You can correct me on this statements.
Your viewpoint is all over the place but you miss one crucial factor at the heart of this. Firstly, you have to be a fairly cohesive and competent nation to compile the resources you need for nuclear weapons. You mention Africa, but there seems to be very few nations on that continent that have solid foundations, even places like South Africa have big social problems that deserve funds over nuclear weapons production. Then there is the middle east, a highly volatile region that does not need any more nuclear weapons because it is largely driven by religious forces who frankly deserve little trust. Places like Saudi arabia are also rich enough and don't want to rock the boat.
The world doesn't really need any more nuclear weapons in any country because it just opens up the possibility of massive destruction of the earth. It's hilarious you think a nation like Burkinifaso should be prioritizing the very expensive production of such weapons when they can barely feed and employ their own population, your priorities are severely misjudged.