^^^ These days, AI can make almost any picture you might want. Even before AI, Photoshop could make these.
So you say AI filed the lawsuit in federal court in Riverside, California, in April 2016, A "judge" dismissed the case in May.New lawsuit was filed in June, but withdrawn months later.
A third version of the suit with the plaintiff going by "Jane Doe" was filed in September 2016 and was also dropped months later.
The woman hasn't been heard from since, disappeared.
https://i.ibb.co/pvrtGHJK/Untitled.png
https://i.ibb.co/Q70nvkLc/Untitled.png
Tucker Carlson
https://x.com/i/status/1943876353234813017
AI judge dismissed the case.
Note that all the players in most court cases these days are 'persons' >>> artificial entities. And when the man/woman uses an attorney, they sign a contract to be represented by the attorney, thereby eliminating their right to stand as a man/woman in the case.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=CORPUS+JURIS+SECUNDUM%2C+client+of+an+attorney&ia=web
https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/why-does-someone-who-hires-an-attorney-become-a-wa-1009070.html
https://educationcenter2000.com/
So, by signing up with an attorney, one gives up his rights as a man/woman, and the courts can do with him/her what they want.