Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Nuclear weapons
by
₿itcoin
on 13/07/2025, 12:22:34 UTC
I have come to understand that the countries we mostly refers to as world powers or the big five like USA, Russia, China, Germany  etc all deals with nuclear weapons that post treats, fears and minority orientations to other countries. Countries like Arab, Iran, Irag, Pakistan and lots more have powers but do not actually have nuclear weapons to withstand or fight the big fives countries rather it has always be a thing of negotiations for resources, boundaries and scales rather than fights and win battles to know who control the world.

Africa has millions of people but can't boast of any weapons except retires guns and stainless used and abandoned by America's and Europeans, and that's why Africa can not stand for their rights like Burkinafaso today,
You can correct me on this statements.

Need a little correction, afaik only 9 countries officially possess nuclear weapons, US, China, Russia, France and UK are the core five where North Koria, Israel, Pak and India also achieved nukes. You will find many Arab countries and Africans align with Iran they are in hype but there is no official data regarding their nukes accivment. You know Africa is truly nuclear-weapon-free zone under the 1996 Pelindaba Treaty, so you will not hear anything about active nukes on that region. Also what I get after the war Iran's nuclear program is being closely monitored. This is why you will find low use of nukes rather most conflicts involve diplomacy and balance-of-power measures. Although negotiation and fear are not same thing but nukes lacking counties most often rely on alliances, regional influence & economic advantage.