Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: [Call to action] BC.game is not entity that should be trusted.
by
JollyGood
on 13/07/2025, 14:47:27 UTC
Leicester FC has silently cancelled BCgame partnership.
I would not be surprised if Leicester City decided to unilaterally cancel their agreement. I searched online but did not find anything at all related to Leicester City cancelling their BC Game sponsorship. Do you have a link in order for us to verify this?

It's clear that this forum and the members who are keeping bc.game running longer than it should are going to continue to help bc.game milk the cow until nothing is left. When they stop spending funds on advertising or when they are legally required to cease operation, they will surely disappear. They are already freezing accounts and selectively stealing from players, there's no reason to believe they will let people withdraw before they close down.
Can you elaborate by providing names that you think are keeping BC Game going longer than it should?

I hope that the forum reprimands those who have been enabling the scam, as even though they will have made a massive amount of money for enabling it for so long, they should at least lose their reputation here for keeping it running. If they aren't, that will prove a massive level of corruption on the forum for enabling and prolonging such a scam, and allowing members who enabled it to continue being recognised as credible members here. If it weren't for these members (who are very aware of what is going on by this point and clearly negligent of as to what is right and wrong), bc.game might have been ousted as a scam and may already have been closed by now, or at least would have lost its reputation.
The forum itself will not reprimand any members for anything they might have done, that is not how things work. If members get together and form consensus, they could tag accounts but for that to happen there has to be a case. If you feel strongly about this you should at least provide names along with posts that prove some sort of collusion because you cannot make a case without evidence.