Can you explain this in your own words, if you truly believe that simple logic can help you win in sports betting?
Tell me how you analyze games in a simple way and still manage to win consistently, something that most of us struggle with.
They say you need to analyze thoroughly and consider tons of data to make the right decisions… but if we’re just using the word "logic," then all of that might not even be necessary anymore.
What do you think, is that really possible?
Dude, I understand your idea that simple logic might seem enough to win, but I dont believe that it's works consistently in the long run to sport betting... because its makes more sense when you think about the following:
Bookmakers invest an lot of money with heavy analysis and statistical modeling's algorithms, so the fact that you are using simple logic against all that is so crazy... you really need to analyze some data and try on to bet on "subtle errors" that they haven't detected yet.
And another thing... the unpredictability of games, whether due to injuries, weather, officiating, etc.... greatly influences the results and many of these variables are difficult or impossible to quantify with an simple logic.
Any logic you use without data is just guesswork... its gambling with luck. To win consistently, you need an edge over the house, and the best way to achieve this is to identify probabilities that are incorrect or that haven't yet been identified by the house.