Okay but this just keeps feeding that distrust toward the puzzle's motives, right? Like, it switched gears from government conspiracy straight to corporate money-grabbing. They ain't just spreading FUD; they're actually laying out a solid (if kinda extreme) take. Thing is, they're totally sleeping on key details: the huge difference between public crypto challenges getting cracked and someone busting into a private system, plus how that whole 'finders keepers' idea clashes with blockchain's basic nature. And Wanderingaran's whole hang-up that 'brute-forcing = always illegal'? That feels like a total brain glitch on the fundamentals, man. Missing the mark big time.
