In fact, comparing or attempting to measure the total production of Bitcoin (BTC) with metals like gold, silver, or other commodities is not without reason. There is both a philosophical and economic context behind this approach. Precious metals have served as benchmarks of value for thousands of years due to their scarcity, limited production, and global acceptance as a store of value. Bitcoin, with its maximum quantity of 21 million units and its increasingly difficult mining process, is often considered "digital gold." Therefore, when someone suggests comparing the number of BTC in circulation to the production of other metals, it is usually done to assess the scale of scarcity, potential value, and long-term economic impact. While this comparison may seem strange at first, it can provide new insights into how the modern monetary system may be shifting from physical assets to digital ones. I understand your confusion, as comparing something virtual to something tangible seems odd, but that's precisely where the interesting discussion lies.