Re: [Call to action] BC.game is not entity that should be trusted.
It has become pointless discussing whether or not they are scammers or no.
If you just check all ADR complaints against BC.game, you can clearly see a pattern, where huge winner's account become instant "multiple account" rule breaker, yet when anyone inquires to get verifiable piece of information on that rule being broken, you are not allowed to see.
If we disregard my complaint and just use common practice in privacy laws - data protection (GDPR in Europe and similar in other parts of the world), it clearly shows that they don't even follow those rules, because you are unable to view data related to "possibly" your account, and if they claim it was/is yours, they should be able to show you that data.
Now on the other hand, lets look at their "Vaults Pro" rules/faq (this is also part of the evidence in another case against them):
Using their own words, assets in Vault Pro belongs to players and shouldn't be touched by anyone other than the depositor.
By banning player's accounts (from gambling platform), they are effectively holding depositors' money hostage from the depositors (trading/investment "platform", yeah they have defined Vault Pro differently), effectively breaking their own Terms, who knows how many laws and showing further their scamming behavior.
Now, to get back at "enablement" by running the campaign or advertising bc.game, I totally agree with BenCodie that anyone who's enabling further business by advertising them is effectively part of their scam operation. Not directly in any way, but enabling BC.game to find another victim in present/future time.
Having said that and understanding forum's "free speech" policy, campaign manager (@Little Mouse) is the one effectively "running" their scam operations at this present moment, and would be the one to really ask himself whether or not money is worth possibly losing his reputation in (near or distant) future because of them.
If you just check all ADR complaints against BC.game, you can clearly see a pattern, where huge winner's account become instant "multiple account" rule breaker, yet when anyone inquires to get verifiable piece of information on that rule being broken, you are not allowed to see.
If we disregard my complaint and just use common practice in privacy laws - data protection (GDPR in Europe and similar in other parts of the world), it clearly shows that they don't even follow those rules, because you are unable to view data related to "possibly" your account, and if they claim it was/is yours, they should be able to show you that data.
Now on the other hand, lets look at their "Vaults Pro" rules/faq (this is also part of the evidence in another case against them):
Using their own words, assets in Vault Pro belongs to players and shouldn't be touched by anyone other than the depositor.
By banning player's accounts (from gambling platform), they are effectively holding depositors' money hostage from the depositors (trading/investment "platform", yeah they have defined Vault Pro differently), effectively breaking their own Terms, who knows how many laws and showing further their scamming behavior.
Now, to get back at "enablement" by running the campaign or advertising bc.game, I totally agree with BenCodie that anyone who's enabling further business by advertising them is effectively part of their scam operation. Not directly in any way, but enabling BC.game to find another victim in present/future time.
Having said that and understanding forum's "free speech" policy, campaign manager (@Little Mouse) is the one effectively "running" their scam operations at this present moment, and would be the one to really ask himself whether or not money is worth possibly losing his reputation in (near or distant) future because of them.