Do top leaders or presidents of countries or big corporations and businesses do better economically because they were brought up from a rich family background with wealthy parents or from a poor family background with poor parents?
Doing well economically has nothing to do with your family background because coming from a rich family doesn’t mean you can handle well large amount of money without misusing it. Also coming out from poor family doesn’t mean you’ll be able to make use of money judiciously to what they’re assigned for. You’ll have to learn that either though school or through the system over years of experience.
Or better put, does the financial status of ones family background, that is, does one being born and brought up by rich or poor parents, have a lot to do with how well they do later in life when they attain leadership roles in big corporations and businesses or become the president of a country?
I don’t think the type of family you come out from will totally shape how you rule over a group of people or a country when given the mandate to take leadership role on them. What is more important that will tell on how the person will rule this people is by the nature of their upbringing in the family and also how they go on outside to showcase this behaviors with their environs. Your relationship with the people you rule over has a lot to do about your initial upbringing and how you can be able to manager them well effectively.