This is good. Why? My logic uses straight-forward thinking that addresses the points of the topic.

Your logic has a base in science... science that is almost never brought up by you. Rather, your logic is based in how much you can talk. You seem to think that if you can repeat your ideas enough, they will suddenly (or not so suddenly) become facts.

Well, I have to admit. Your logic absolutely IS based in science. But it isn't the science of the things of the topic. Rather, it is Political Science. And the fundamentals of political science are, "Talk loud enough and long enough and you become the winner." So, your logic is based in out-talking other logic with your talk logic, even when and especially when it doesn't make any sense. And if you can use enough expletives, your talk logic really becomes right, much faster.

This is even your whole problem with your idea of universities. Talk your logic loud and long, with lots of expletives thrown in, and everybody else suddenly becomes a believer in your crap. But if they believe your crap or not, you still win, because they can never out-talk you. Lol.

Thanks for not including me in your logic.