To future devs, especially on small tokens that are just coming up, if you're really interested in building something great and not a pump and dump scheme, then you need these two things, which I've seen as attributes in some of the big 10 tokens we all celebrate today. The first one is building your holders and just buyers. If people have more interest in what a project could become in the future and see how serious the people behind the project are, they will definitely stay. For a project like Eclipse, which I added recently to my portfolio, I saw serious potential with 650,000 potential token holders and high community activity, with 30K–40K average tweet views and over 580K monthly site visitors. Who won't want that for a long-term project? Most especially when the launchpool is available for everyone , the moment you lock BGB or the token you get to share 1,295,600 of it.
Lastly, make sure you're ready to accept criticism and, if some of those are good, use them to build the vision. With these, you may be building an ecosystem for yourself without knowing. Is there any advice you'd like to add?
So another thread with having some BGB inserts. Lastly, make sure you're ready to accept criticism and, if some of those are good, use them to build the vision. With these, you may be building an ecosystem for yourself without knowing. Is there any advice you'd like to add?
Going back into the topic, it would be that great if developers will be having that kind of approach when it comes to this aspect that they would be that focusing into the project that they had made and trying to maintain the community or simply to those who do make out some investments with them just because they've seen that seriousness but we do know that developers are just that humans on which there's always that tendency that devs could end up on having that rugpull project just because they cant be able to resist out that millions of dollars in front of their eyes on which they could have that changed their lives forever once they have seen up that chance. This is why we do see some projects ending up on rug pulls by its devs just because of this kind of mentality but i do agree into those points above.
It all matters about on how you do drive your project and keeping it that always being developed into something that more established kind of project. We do know that each of these projects does have their own
utility and if the community or investors do saw up that importance and potential then they'll surely stay but come to think that there would be always those other factors on which they would be building up that trust and confidence towards the project.